de| en| es  

Questioning - the world we live in. How can we collaborate in shaping a sustainable future? How can science and art as social systems not only cooperate but also monitor themselves? How can we check our own research questions, methods of work and areas of impact?
You want to be the PROJECT OF THE MONTH? See how it works!


JOIN THE DIALOGUE - every four months the section under the heading "questioning" presents a new topic or project. Previous topics and projects can be found in the ARCHIVE. >> You want to comment upon or challenge the TOPIC | PROJECT OF THE MONTH? Then visit our RESEARCH ARTS Dialogue Blog. >>


THE PROJECT OF THE MONTH: The "Shared Space" of the cities - the artistic strategy of Marjetica Potrč






Marjetica Potrč, Presentation at the Representation of Lower Saxony in Berlin, 5th of December 2012. (Photos: Stella Veciana)



Commons - wealth by sharing. Source: "Gemeingüter - Wohlstand durch Teilen." Silke Helfrich, Rainer Kuhlen, Wolfgang Sachs, Christian Siefkes. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin, 2010, p. 20.



"Sustainable : Art // Daniel Frese Price 2012", at the Representation of Lower Saxony in Berlin, 5th of December 2012. In Cooperation with the Leuphana University Lüneburg, the "Kunstraum der Leuphana", "Lüneburger Innovations-Inkubator" and the support of the WBGU, BMBF year of science 2012.

What do Caracas and Amsterdam have in common? The artistic strategy of "commoning" in the "shared space" of the cities.

For the final event "Sustainable : Art", within the framework of the annual program "Good news / / Sustainability viewed by art and culture", national and international artists were invited to introduce their work to the audience in order to give an insight into the "sustainability debate" in the visual arts. However, at the event itself no debate took place, but more on that at the end of the article. Marjetica Potrč (*1953, Ljubljana, Slovenia) gave the most impressive presentation of the evening. She questioned the usual notions of city and how we want to live in them. Moreover, she provided specific fields of action, where neighbours realize their visions, creatively shaping the future of the “shared space” of the city.

To focus on our preconceived ideas of the city, Potrč asked the audience what Caracas and Amsterdam have in common. And she did this not because she wanted to compare the 'Caracas barrios' with their "two-day-a-week water supply' with the 'Nieuw West' district and its "just-for-watching-greenery" (kijkgroen). What really mattered to her was introducing the audience to the "shared vision of the future" of city residents, through an analysis of their experience with on-site projects. The idea of the “urban metropolis” would shift to that of neighbourhoods, and "public space" would become "shared space". The possession of land and space should in the future be replaced by “control / usage rules”. Crucial to the townspeople would be that architecture would no longer be taken for granted in terms of “design of structures”, but as a “bottom-up organized social architecture”. Also, individual property would be replaced by shared space and knowledge. Furthermore, the “culture of consumerism” being "fast, global, un-political, urban and fun", would be replaced by a “culture of living”. This “culture of life” would be based on only long-term, local, and politically oriented approaches, as well as balancing the rural with the urban. In short, she presented a vision of the future of cities focused on the local, small and independent.

On what specific experiences does Potrč base her analysis, which has led her to this future vision of townspeople? An example is the project "The Cook, the Farmer, His Wife and Their Neighbour" ('Stedelijk Goes West', Potrč and Wild West, Amsterdam 2009). This initiative transformed a public non-walkable green space into a common scale vegetable garden, and an unused room at Lodewijk van Deysselstraat 61 into a neighbourhood kitchen. This bottom-up organization of urban landscape gave the neighbours access to and use of public property, and therefore questioned the exclusion of access (e.g. the kijkgroen) associated with the regime of private property. The project raised the question of the commons, and of the ability of user communities to define effective access and usage rules.

This vision for urban space would alter the use of public space, but more importantly, the communal planting and cooking activities would transform the coexistence and communication between neighbours, reported Potrč. In many cities, anonymous neighbours live next-doors without even recognizing each other on sight. Through this project, neighbours exchanged not only their names, but also their knowledge, which they needed in their joint project. Perhaps this very lively network of social communications relay the potential to develop the common goods? Art here becomes a tool for processes of cultural change. Potrč looks for ways to overcome the "tragedy of the commons" by helping people to develop and enforce self-organized rules for dealing with the commons. But what conditions lie behind the positive assumption that art could act as an “advocate for processes of cultural change”? What is the social field of action of the artist as a mediator?

Potrč had also gained valuable experiences in the "Dry Toilet" project (La Vega barrio, and Potrč Liyat Esakov, Caracas 2003). The "dry toilet" was installed on a hill in La Vega barrio, a district with a very low water supply. The project was supported by the Caracas Case Project, the German Federal Cultural Foundation and the Venezuelan Ministry of Environment. Public funds for development projects are necessary, but will it become a task for the arts to take care of urban infrastructure problems in developing countries?
What role can the arts play in tackling global problems such as poverty, climate change and the scarcity of resources?  Which artistic practices could play a transformative role in a global context? What can the arts contribute to scientific research projects on sustainability?

The question, however, with which Potrč was often confronted, and which really surprised her was: Where is the art in this 'on-site project'? This question came particularly from visitors to the Stedelijk. The museum had supported the Amsterdam City Garden Project and invited the audience to visit it. In her article “Is This Art? The Relational Object in a Shared Space" (2010), Potrč tries to answer this question: “I want to trace public transformation from object sculpture to a “relational object” as well as the transformation from public space into shared space”. Potrč places herself in the tradition of “land art” - the idea of sculpture as an object extended to the countryside, but with the difference that in her case, the countryside is not there to be contemplated, but rather to be cultivated. The “social sculpture” of Beuys influenced her practice in that it also is an existential experience about co-existence and shared creativity embodied and enabled by art. She sees a reference to Lydia Clark's “relational objects”, in the experience of the existential self with and through the Other. Finally, she sees the idea of the ‘shared space' as developing from the desire of a community to make their environment different by creating a sustainable vision and pursuing this vision through a process of 'participatory design'. What particularly distinguishes Potrč, and which her art adds to the 'shared spaces' of cities, is the dimension of ‘Commons'. Art is challenged by her work: what would something like an aesthetics of the commons look like, and how do we want an art practice of the commons to be implemented?

In a passage of the previously mentioned article Potrč writes: "For the [art] visitor, the community garden is an art object: it is a 'relational object'. For the neighbours who use it, however, it is an element in their building of community." Like Luhmann says, each object carries a different meaning depending on within which social system it is considered (i.e. economy, law, politics, science, art), and furthermore , within one system such as the system of science, each scientific object is examined with the methods specific to a discipline and described with the appropriate technical language, giving the object a particular meaning within each research field. Some research questions relating to Potrč’s work relevant for the Research Arts, are for example: By which criteria and evaluation indicators does Potrčs’ vision for the future of cities differ from those of the expert advisors of the Federal Government? What kind of resilient practices have already been developed by active neighbourhoods in crisis situations? What could the new fields of action of a rural-urban coexistence actually look like? What additional training (science literacy) is required of the combatants of neighbourhoods?

So, how should a sustainability debate be conducted from the perspective of the arts? Coming back to the issue raised by "Sustainable : Art", the program of speakers was unfortunately so densely organized that there was no time for questions from the audience, nor for a debate on sustainability in the arts. But how can a 'relational' interest around sustainability topics be formed if there is no time for a direct exchange with the audience? Without a stimulating dialogue of inspiring views, such events usually fizzle out into nothing. The exchange was probably expected to take place at the subsequent lavish buffet. But here the inspiring ideas were scattered in many individual conversations. And the buffet, which consisted solely of meat dishes, did not correspond to what could be expected of sustainable event management. Conclusion: not only the content, the “what”, of an event matters, but also it’s process design, it’s “how”. How can a cultural event be organized sustainably? It has to be admitted though, that in the area of sustainable cultural management a lot has been tried out in the last years. Less evident is an art practice of the commons. If the art world would strengthen it’s research on the commons, it would undoubtedly provide many relevant research questions and surprising areas of action.


stella veciana

Author: Dr. Stella Veciana - Studies in Experimental arts at the UdK University of Arts Berlin, Computer Arts at the School of Visual Arts in New York City and Cultural Policy & Management at the University Barcelona. Visiting Professor at the Faculty of Fine Arts of Barcelona and author for online master modules at the Postgraduate Institute of Madrid. PhD dissertation entiteled "Research arts: the interface between art, science and technology as a field of knowledge and action" at the University of Barcelona. more

THE ARCHIVE PROJECTS and THEMES of the area of activity "Questioning" 2013


PetzerFreiheitMai 2013

THE PROJECT OF THE MONTH (Mai/Aug 2013): "Three Pieces for Street Sweepers. From the Invisible to the Visible". Pia Lanzinger.- In the historic center of Mexico City, three stages were set up on which three performances with barrenderos (street sweepers) took place. The street wheepers, whose usual job is removing the garbage thatt collects in the area, receive as little attention in public space as the problem of refuse itself, which already poses insurmountable obstacles for the city. The performances suspend this tendency to invisibility for a few moments during which the barrenderos, who largely conceptualized their own pieces, present themselves as individuals, with their own perspectives and cultural aspirations. more

THE THEME OF THE MONTH (Mai/Aug 2013): "Bringing storytelling into life“. Pia Lanziger’s Aesthetics of Commoning. Stella Veciana in conversation with Pia Lanzinger. - Since the nineties, Lanziger’s artistic work strategy has evolved out of public participation processes and storytelling. Ranging from information sessions, through surveys and discussions, to joint training and design processes, her projects have applied different levels of participation in a variety of urban and rural contexts. With her expanded art formats and her creative transfer of diverse methods from the social sciences and humanities into the public sphere, she has contributed significantly to an emergent aesthetics of Commoning. more soon...

January 2013

THE PROJECT OF THE MONTH (Jan/Apr 2013): The "Shared Space" of the cities - the artistic strategy of Marjetica Potrč. Stella Veciana. - Potrč not only questions our notions of the city but also how we want to live within this "shared space". Furthermore, the artist creates concrete areas of interaction where neighbours can creatively implement their visions for the city. With her projects she raises an artistic strategy from the perspective of the commons, shedding new light upon the "town system" and the "art system". The classic "art object" becomes a "relational object" and the utopian social sculpture of Beuys becomes something useful in the mundane world of the city gardener. This article also discusses what possible questions might become relevant to science. more

cc v

imprint | contact